276
Playing Card Plethora / Re: #playingcards on Instagram
« on: November 15, 2012, 09:19:13 PM »
Hello people. Those are some nice pictures. Mine is Instagram.com/siegismyname. Do follow.
You are Here: |
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think the crown decks come with a blank card. I've only opened a green crown deck but it had a blank card in itmy green crown came with a double backer
That cheap, you think? I'd think more. You could pay around $400-500 just for the first six decks, versions one through three in both colors.I dont think the first three versions are worth THAT much. They are probably around $300-400 range. This entire brick would definitely be worth the buy if it was under $450.
its on the top, give me a few minutes and I will show you.so thats what it says under the seal. I reckon it would be a continuous string of 0s and 1s.
EDIT pic added. It does not have the Theory11 symbol anywhere on it though.
Well, the Pr1me decks had a round seal.At first, it's appealing, but think about the price point, sure, it's the entire S&M series as well as maybe a "limited" collector's box, but wouldn't that cost maybe a few hundred dollars?
Also, if Don't theory11 is correct of a deck seal, is this the first circular one made?
Dude - spellcheck is not a replacement for proofreading...
To my knowledge, there hasn't been a round deck seal before. The original tax stamps upon which the seals were based were always either square or rectangular, so the manufacturer seals kept this tradition. USPC uses square stickers, while Arrco (while it still was a separate company) used rectangular stickers.
Via facebook and Instagram, it appears that the "thing no one has done" might involve a case of some kind. Looks vaguely like an ammo box to me, and there is a dog tag.The first picture looks like the top of the new box partially obscured just so nicely by the dnd dog tag. and it seems to suggest that there will be a seal of sorts. Well its all mere speculation. ^^
Quite true. I didnt think of that. I still havent placed an order as it just didnt connect with me with the custom pips and stuff. There are still no review of this deck. Hmmmmmm.I reckon that they released the link because they are a business after all. Which business would print decks and not sell them to the public. It was only a matter of time before they released the link.
from a business standpoint, keeping it a secret had the potential to work out for future decks, being able to market future secrets effectively based on the past success of the deck and how keeping it a secret could have made it so only the people who bought the first deck would've gotten the second. Unfortunately it didn't work out like that, but if it did it could've been a good thing for future sales on decks.
this is of course only my opinion, but I figure that's what they were going for
Yes. MY interpretations are exactly the same as yours. Its the double D logo that is found on almost everything dnd. And I do not think that this is related to the v7s. It should be another product by itself from what they are saying.Here is the photo that Don is talking about. It is a close up of what looks to be a tuck box. You can see an embossed "I"People having been guessing that its the tuck box but Dan & Dave responded back saying, "Your guesses are good, but far from close. Its like nothing we've ever done before - or anyone for that matter." I took that as its not the tuck box. Plus it looks more like Dan & Daves double D logo an not an "i."
He actually performed the duct tape effect before but he brought it to a whole new level with a new ending to the effect. I would very much like to learn the first effect where a signed card goes into a bottle. Any idea where I can get it Don?Lu Chen using Project C deck (program in Mandarin Chinese, it is a Taiwanese TV program)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=134HSRET92Q&feature=share
Card trick starts at 05:05
Sorry this is not the Entwined Hearts trick.
Awesome set! I think I have the last two bits figured out and the first is commercially available, but his performance was excellent and I can't understand a word of Chinese.
you are right. I looked at it in the eyes of a magician, and yes I understand every word of it. Even as a layman I think it was slightly too long. probaly 3/4 of the time would be perfect. maybe I am more used to the DnD style of direct in-the-face and shorter tricks. It is a fine trick none the less.Here is a link to Zenneth's performance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCKMm-XYmwM
No offence to Zenneth, but this trick looks very similar to Wayne Houchin's Distortion and I am sure the handling can be improved on such as getting rid of the double backer altogether which gets rid of the 'TL' in the end. I am sure it doesn't matter to your regular layperson but I reckon that would be a cleaner ending. And also the routine that is slightly long.
P.S If Zenneth is reading this, do you happen to have a performance clip of Lu Chen doing this effect as it says on the coterie site that the T.V performance right is sold to him in 2012. Thanks.
I thought the performance was fine. I looked at it with the eyes of a spectator, not the eyes of a magician - which I'm sure you didn't. To a layman, I'm sure it was just a cool trick. As far as judging the routine on length, it's hard to evaluate when you can't understand the language, as I can't. Can you?
i dont want to say too much because a friend of mine show me the exact printed instruction which was given to him by blaine himself. but basically tilt the card alittle or see it by a angle you can see there is a line that is thicker than the rest. by that you can tell if the card is a high number or low number. This allow you to read the marking even across the room. i still cant fully read it myself but just play around with it, the marking is truly one of a kindstill cant find this line
the marking is ingenious, to differentiate the overlapping marks you need to read the stripes.care to elaborate? or you can PM me
The UV would most probably be the exact same as the blue ones. But who knows? That's just a guess. Seeing the Rainbow ones make my regret of getting them lesser. But it is still a nice deck though.I have been waiting for this review for a while now. Thanks for the review. Especially the UV part. The difference in the marking system for the 7 and Q is also something which I didn't figure out. U mentioned in the review that your friend opened the purple lions? May we have a glimpse of it. Some pictures would be gladly appreciated.
sorry late for post
bcuz I have heavy schoolwork
yes
my friend River opened a DB signature "Rainbow deck" from AIP bottle set
but...
it's looks deep purple not rainbow
so now I also curious about is the UV deck from variety box
Mine would have to be when Dan & Dave first came out with the Smoke & Mirror V1's. I bought a brick of each and have only opened 1 Mirror deck. The rest are chillin in my display cabinet.that was a very very very smart buy. Almost as good as if you bought some JNs back in the days when they cost a dollar a pack or what every minuscule amount.