76
Playing Card Plethora / Re: 2012 Phoenix Apocalypse Deck
« on: April 06, 2012, 07:39:22 PM »Looks really nice... Did anyone mention USPCC yet???
His write up says they are made by USPCC
Thanks!
You are Here: |
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Looks really nice... Did anyone mention USPCC yet???
The numbers Reagan gave weren't entirely true, but little did I know that. Also, since the demand is MUCH lower than the supply, I obviously know that we won't nearly get the decks as low as the price Reagan payed, but it's the same for most decks! I'm just kinda being the devil's advocate here so I will stop. I don't have much more points to argue anyways, and anyways if we really want to continue this debate, I think we should do so on the Ultra Ape Deck Thread.Too many times, too many people ignore the facts and just plain lie on this forum to suit their own needs. Perfect example yesterday Nathancards says" he is printing 5000 at $1.50 per deck is his cost. Where does he come up with that number?Hey that isn't exactly what I said. I know for a fact that Rajas prints the decks for less than 1$ a deck. And Reagan said that in order to reproduce a finish that makes the deck similar to a plastic deck, it costs him an extra almost .5$ a deck.
Thanks!
So I just rounded it. I didn't back these so I don't know exactly how much they cost. I was just throwing it out there. No need to stone me for a simple mistake. I agree with the points you are making. All I am saying is that we can't expect the best deck on earth printed for 1$ a deck.
But when you just throw out numbers arbitrarily, people assume it's fact. If you don't know, then you should not really be quoting numbers. Exactly my point. So what do you really think you are going to get for a $1.00 a deck?
Personally, I wish it would be the best deck ever made. That would be perfect. The highest quality deck for the cheapest price, could you ask for anymore?
Thanks!
Thx,
Nathan
PS: I am not trying to offend you BMPokerWorld. I think your company is really amazing, and when I am looking for decks to add to my collection I always turn to your company. All I am trying to do is defend Reagan. His designs are improving, and I don't think we should sink him. I do think giving him criticism is great to help him improve though.
PPS: How do you store all your decks? Do you have a storage place, a warehouse... ?
Too many times, too many people ignore the facts and just plain lie on this forum to suit their own needs. Perfect example yesterday Nathancards says" he is printing 5000 at $1.50 per deck is his cost. Where does he come up with that number?Hey that isn't exactly what I said. I know for a fact that Rajas prints the decks for less than 1$ a deck. And Reagan said that in order to reproduce a finish that makes the deck similar to a plastic deck, it costs him an extra almost .5$ a deck.
Thanks!
So I just rounded it. I didn't back these so I don't know exactly how much they cost. I was just throwing it out there. No need to stone me for a simple mistake. I agree with the points you are making. All I am saying is that we can't expect the best deck on earth printed for 1$ a deck.
@ Bmpokerworld : I really wanted to stay out of this but we will be getting a prototype deck soon, this should answer any questions on quality.
Also about the chinese manufacturer, I really didnt know much about cards back then and I am still learning.
As I stated in a previous post, I never said that they were not good, only that USPCC is better. That is a fact. Can they and do they make a good product? Yes, but ReaganM is trying to convince everyone that he is using them because of the quality, which is not the case. He has already posted about using them because he got a "better deal" period. That is what he is concerned with and not quality. Not to mention on the Kickstarter Steampunk ad he states " At 10,000$ we will print using USPCC insuring high quality decks!" So clearly even HE believes USPCC is better. Brahma advertises they can do a custom deck for under a dollar, so I doubt that there is going to be a high quality deck that ReaganM is having them produce for him. I am sure he is going with a cheaper version and why, because he got a"better deal". Those are his words and not mine.
So why isn't he charging less for the deck since he is paying less? Because he clearly is in it for the money as I have previously posted. Just like his watered down back design, shows the time he is putting into this deck. I honestly thought the original back design, when it was going to be a poker deck, was quite good. Now I think the back design is childish and leaves a lot to be desired.
For the record, about 2 years ago, when USPCC was moving and going through a lot of transitional changes, I spoke to one of the"big guys" and they told me in no uncertain terms, they have looked at lots of alternatives to have someone else make their decks but could not find anyone who had the same quality. If they could have, they would have changed. I do not know of one product that Bramha makes better than USPCC. Could they be there some day? Yes. Do they make products that have a place in this industry? Yes. Do they make products that have certain attributes that card handlers are looking for? Yes. Do they make decks that will perform certain tricks that a magician would want? Of course, but overall they are no where near USPCC in quality and performance.
The Archduke Eaglebacks are comparable in handling to the Moth/Myth and the Watcher decks. People rave about those decks because they handle like nothing seen before, certainly not out of USPC. I think you'd be hard pressed to say that USPC's output is consistently better than any of those three decks listed above. Different would be a better term, but not better.
Reagan's Kickstarter project page was created when he thought he'd be stuck using some cheapo Chinese manufacturer noted for terrible-quality cards. It wasn't until near the end of his project's fundraiser that he became aware of Archduke - Rajas had joined the board here, his cards were already known and he announced he was offering reasonably-priced printing at a high level of quality. I introduced Reagan to Archduke, and he got in touch with Rajas, and the rest is history. Rajas had to create Brahma as a subsidiary company due to Indian regulations - Archduke was already registered strictly as a domestic-trade business, so he needed a new company that could be registered for international business. Reagan's deck will be the first under the Brahma imprint, but far from the first off of the presses that Rajas Paranjpe operates out of Mumbai.
USPC didn't know about Brahma or Archduke back in '09 because Brahma didn't yet exist and Archduke wasn't selling internationally - it was other importers that bought his cards in bulk and sent them to other parts of the world. I don't even think they would have created a blip on USPC's radar at the time.
You state flat out that USPC's decks are superior in quality and performance - but have you ever handled a deck made by Archduke? It makes you appear like one of those religious zealots who protest a fictional movie before even knowing what the movie is actually about, simply because someone higher up in their church said it was somehow against their church's doctrine - despite the movie being entirely fictional and in no way claiming to be based on real events, such as "The DaVinci Code". Try out a deck of Eaglebacks, then come back and give a truly self-informed opinion, like I've been doing from the start.
BTW: don't take any of this personally. I happen to think you're a great guy and I've shopped in your store many, many times. We're all very appreciative of your business, and I'm personally a big fan of the Bicycle Premier deck you produced - I consider it one of the best uses of metallic ink in a deck design that I've seen to date.
As I stated in a previous post, I never said that they were not good, only that USPCC is better. That is a fact. Can they and do they make a good product? Yes, but ReaganM is trying to convince everyone that he is using them because of the quality, which is not the case. He has already posted about using them because he got a "better deal" period. That is what he is concerned with and not quality. Not to mention on the Kickstarter Steampunk ad he states " At 10,000$ we will print using USPCC insuring high quality decks!" So clearly even HE believes USPCC is better. Brahma advertises they can do a custom deck for under a dollar, so I doubt that there is going to be a high quality deck that ReaganM is having them produce for him. I am sure he is going with a cheaper version and why, because he got a"better deal". Those are his words and not mine.
So why isn't he charging less for the deck since he is paying less? Because he clearly is in it for the money as I have previously posted. Just like his watered down back design, shows the time he is putting into this deck. I honestly thought the original back design, when it was going to be a poker deck, was quite good. Now I think the back design is childish and leaves a lot to be desired.
For the record, about 2 years ago, when USPCC was moving and going through a lot of transitional changes, I spoke to one of the"big guys" and they told me in no uncertain terms, they have looked at lots of alternatives to have someone else make their decks but could not find anyone who had the same quality. If they could have, they would have changed. I do not know of one product that Bramha makes better than USPCC. Could they be there some day? Yes. Do they make products that have a place in this industry? Yes. Do they make products that have certain attributes that card handlers are looking for? Yes. Do they make decks that will perform certain tricks that a magician would want? Of course, but overall they are no where near USPCC in quality and performance.
The Archduke Eaglebacks are comparable in handling to the Moth/Myth and the Watcher decks. People rave about those decks because they handle like nothing seen before, certainly not out of USPC. I think you'd be hard pressed to say that USPC's output is consistently better than any of those three decks listed above. Different would be a better term, but not better.
Reagan's Kickstarter project page was created when he thought he'd be stuck using some cheapo Chinese manufacturer noted for terrible-quality cards. It wasn't until near the end of his project's fundraiser that he became aware of Archduke - Rajas had joined the board here, his cards were already known and he announced he was offering reasonably-priced printing at a high level of quality. I introduced Reagan to Archduke, and he got in touch with Rajas, and the rest is history. Rajas had to create Brahma as a subsidiary company due to Indian regulations - Archduke was already registered strictly as a domestic-trade business, so he needed a new company that could be registered for international business. Reagan's deck will be the first under the Brahma imprint, but far from the first off of the presses that Rajas Paranjpe operates out of Mumbai.
USPC didn't know about Brahma or Archduke back in '09 because Brahma didn't yet exist and Archduke wasn't selling internationally - it was other importers that bought his cards in bulk and sent them to other parts of the world. I don't even think they would have created a blip on USPC's radar at the time.
You state flat out that USPC's decks are superior in quality and performance - but have you ever handled a deck made by Archduke? It makes you appear like one of those religious zealots who protest a fictional movie before even knowing what the movie is actually about, simply because someone higher up in their church said it was somehow against their church's doctrine - despite the movie being entirely fictional and in no way claiming to be based on real events, such as "The DaVinci Code". Try out a deck of Eaglebacks, then come back and give a truly self-informed opinion, like I've been doing from the start.
BTW: don't take any of this personally. I happen to think you're a great guy and I've shopped in your store many, many times. We're all very appreciative of your business, and I'm personally a big fan of the Bicycle Premier deck you produced - I consider it one of the best uses of metallic ink in a deck design that I've seen to date.
The thing that bothers me most about the Mystic Deck, besides the horrible design, is that they are using a Purple color that doesn't exist in the CMYK spectrum! It's fine to have a bright Purple like that as an RGB web color but there's no way that color is printable as 4-Color Process. They might be planning on printing it as a 1-Color Pantone but I highly doubt they have the prepress knowledge of how to convert it to a 1-Color job properly.
I do agree that the ideal situation for a Kickstarter playing card project going live once the cards are complete. When I was planning on going through Kickstarter for my decks I wasn't going to launch until the designs were finished. I figured working on marketing the campaign was enough to worry about when it was running. I think a perfect example is what Paul did for his Tendril campaign. He launched once the cards, and a really nice video, were finished. That way he could concentrate on marketing and was prepping the cards for print once it was obvious he would reach his goal. Now it looks like they will be printed and in our hands very quickly compared to other Kickstarter projects.
thanks, Randy
I agree with you on some points, BMPokerWorld, but there is one thing you got wrong: you said he is in for quick money. With Rajas and the finish these cards will have, 5,000 decks will be printed for almost 1.5$ each. That makes already 7,500$. In addition to that, Kickstarter and Amazon take another 10%. 10% of 8,500$ is 850$. 7,500+850 is 8,350, meaning he makes a bit more than 150$. Individually, the cards cost a lot more than how much Reagan payed to have each one printed, but knowing that he won't be able to sell all 5,000 of them, it is his only way of reaching his goal.
I agree with you on some points, BMPokerWorld, but there is one thing you got wrong: you said he is in for quick money. With Rajas and the finish these cards will have, 5,000 decks will be printed for almost 1.5$ each. That makes already 7,500$. In addition to that, Kickstarter and Amazon take another 10%. 10% of 8,500$ is 850$. 7,500+850 is 8,350, meaning he makes a bit more than 150$. Individually, the cards cost a lot more than how much Reagan payed to have each one printed, but knowing that he won't be able to sell all 5,000 of them, it is his only way of reaching his goal.
On KS it says the back is 25% done. WHY START A KICK STARTER?!?!? Maybe in the end it will be a decent back but at this stage it is terrible.
Uh, hello? Lance Miller himself wasn't fully finished with the design phase of the Actuators when they went up for KS. It's part of why it took so long for them to see the light of day, but it's not like Reagan is unique in this.
Terrible is a relative term. I personally like the design concepts he's working on. The only reason I haven't backed yet is that I really can't afford to do so. As much as I like them, I'd prefer keeping my car insured and keeping my cellphone working...
Ohhh...Thank you! But it looks that is not working...anyway this whole fame and badges bullshit is making this forum load very slowly...
I don't care about "fame", I'm here for good information about playing cards...
Now you can all start "defame" me...
It's not working for you because anyone with negative fame can't upfame or downfame a post. You're at -4 as of this post.
@Nathan - your "review"... It really wasn't. And who reviews a deck box? It looked like you were trying to be funny and snarky, but didn't quite make it, I'm sorry to say.
@everybody - you're all allowed whatever freakin' opinions you want. But the mean-spiritedness of some of the posts do push the boundaries. If you want to go at it with someone, please, take it to PM and knock yourselves out. This whole damn topic is so far off-topic right now, it's ridiculous.
@BMPokerWorld - he opted for using Brahma Playing Cards not only for the better deal but for the quality of that card maker's products. No, they aren't USPC, but USPC isn't the only company that can put together a decent deck of cards. Brahma is the international division of Archduke Playing Cards, the makers of the Archduke Eaglebacks, widely considered to be one of the best decks on the market, with a quality rivaling or even exceeding USPC products.
Don't take my word for it alone; look at these reviews:
http://www.unitedcardists.net/uc/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1932
There's a ton of video reviews for them on YouTube as well. I'm not saying they're the greatest cards ever made, but I am saying this printer is good competition for the 800-pound gorilla of the card industry and that the products are worth noticing.
And now, about those Mystic whatevers... They're really ugly. You couldn't pay me to buy a deck. Period.
@bmpokerworld... hear hear!!! Couldn't have said it better myself...Well if my steampunk deck was garbage it wouldnt have 200+ backers. Im really geting tired of this, but you are right that someone else agrees with you, thatd be bmpokerworld, shake hands, now you dont have to pretend to yourself that there is some magical group of people that agree with you but say nothing, cuz at least now theres one.
@Reagan... You shouldn't be talking about anyone else's decks after the steampunk and gorilla messes that you continue to post about so proudly (and just so you know, there are a number of people that agree with me, but want to remain anonymous)... And those of you who need a list of things wrong with the decks, just stop it already... Just look at both of them... if you collect cards, then you should be insulted that these are being posted on this forum altogether...
@Nathan... At risk of alienating you or anyone else, you do come across as though you are very knowledgable about many topics, but I believe that you are not... I am still unsure of your age, but have asked a number of times, because I believe that a child that not allowed to buy decks because his mommy or daddy says so would really be hard pressed to add wisdom or pertinent information to any thread...
As far as the topic... How very sad... "I'm the creator and CEO of PDC (Purple Diamond Cards) who makes custom cards for companies and for magicians/card artists like you." You've made no custom cards for magicians or card artists ever... You're not CEO of anything... In fact I'd say you don't have a corporation, llc, or anything for that matter... as far as your ecstasy decks, I'd say it looks as though you've probably taken to much already and should probably stop..
As far as Kickstarter goes, it appears to have jumped the shark, but there are occasionally a few diamonds amongst the rest of the garbage for every ape deck there is a Vortex, for every steampunk deck there is a Tendril, and for every purple x deck there is a Spectrum...
Sorry im acting like a child now, but I do beleive in those cards, im just really getting tired of this.
Unfortunately since everyone keeps supporting Kickstarter, these things will continue to happen and the problems will keep getting worse and worse.I understand where you are getting at. As long as the crappy decks don't succeed, I don't think it is a major issue. What I don't understand is which company they are using to have these at 2$ a deck... I don't think they calculated right.
Thanks!
Also the design is hideous.
@BMPokerWorld - I believe it is easy for you to say that we should stop using kickstarter since you mainly resell large companies' decks. However I believe the only way to get creativity to keep on flowing is to have small companies getting created regularly and have them put pressure on the "Big Guys".