| You are Here: |
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
It's an interesting concept, but I don't like the execution, particularly how the faces have background printing into the bleed.
What is this *mystery* deck, I'm curious to know since they are no longer available.
Seems like you have to spend $78 to get any decks
I love Tolkien and the entire world. I've looked into doing a LOTR deck but the Tolkien estate requires anybody that is applying for a license to have been producing in that specific field for a minimum of three years before even considering an application. So I just started the clock.
I've got a question for you guys: I've received my Espionage decks and one thig is for sure: the stock and/or finish are not standard. Does anyone knows what kind of stock or finish were used?
Got these directly from Lawrence Sullivan last week: a mixed brick, a carbon fiber clip and a Legends Playing Card Co pack jacket.
I had my doubts about the clip when I first saw it online, but two Thursdays ago I saw one down at CARC and was pretty amazed - strong but very light. If I had fewer clips, I'd pounce on that immediately.
I am (generally) NOT a fan of "semi-transformational" decks (those, like this one, in which each card has the right number of pips, but they are located, oriented, sized and skewed in whatever way the artist feels best serves his or her concept for the card)....Appreciating all of that, I tend to think of "semi-transformational" cards as somewhat a product of creative laziness (of course, if I ever designed and created one myself, my appreciation for them might increase tremendously).
From our correspondence (since 2012) about playing cards and transformation decks, this is a bit disappointing to hear. I was supportive of the deck concepts and images you shared with me, but your recent statements make me question how genuine your support was of my work back then. To each his own though.
