You are Here:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bhong

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 17
1
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Marquis Playing Cards - coming soon!
« on: March 30, 2017, 10:43:54 PM »
I am really liking this deck design a lot.

Thanks Don! I tried to both go classic and traditional all at once.

Kardify is helping me run a wonderful Giveaway Contest on their site: Kardify x Marquis Playing Cards Giveaway



There are some amazing items and honestly all my backers are automatically entered.

2
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Marquis Playing Cards - coming soon!
« on: March 25, 2017, 01:09:20 PM »
Hi everyone!

So quick short update: Marquis Playing Cards is now live!

But I wanted to share some images from the project. I wanted to create two completely unique court sets for this project where one is a re-design of traditional court cards in my style while another is an illustrated court sets. One of the coolest thing about the project is that Sherman (of Carat Card Cases) and me have been developing this idea to have a fully engraved on all panel Carat Card Case. It's something we had thought up of during Dynasty, but it was too late for me to use it for the project as the project was funded and in post-production already.







3
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Marquis Playing Cards - coming soon!
« on: March 24, 2017, 08:52:30 PM »
Thanks for all the kind words.

Just a quick update for everyone, the project launches tomorrow (March 25th) at noon EST on Kickstarter.

Please check it out, but Kardify has kindly written up a first look about Marquis Playing Cards with some lovely photos by Anthony Ingrassia (Sparkz on the PCF) and some renders of some of the tucks for the project.

4
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Marquis Playing Cards - coming soon!
« on: March 17, 2017, 05:02:49 PM »
Ditto what Fess said.....
Like to see these in a spread.

-eh

Eddie, you'll see some soon and thanks for the kind words to Fess and you.

I'm in the last stage of finalizing everything and Anthony has taken some amazing photos that'll be popping up later with a more in-depth look at the deck.

I can tell you for sure I've tried to do some new things and listen to feedback that I've gotten from backers.

5
Playing Card Plethora / Marquis Playing Cards - coming soon!
« on: March 17, 2017, 01:20:33 PM »
Hello PCF users!

Some of you guys might remember me from the early days of Kings Wild Project (I may have answered your questions on Kickstarter or helped with your order) or as that guy that designed a series inspired by Bee, The Hive, and then recently, a Chinese theme deck, Dynasty.

I've got a deck coming out soon: Marquis Playing Cards. Here's a quick teaser image (photo by the wonder Anthony Ingrassia) and there's a short first look article on Kardify . More info and images soon.


6
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Can you recommend Kickbooster?
« on: March 17, 2017, 01:15:46 PM »
Hi,

I haven't used anything like Kickbooster. My suggestion and your mileage may very, is if you're willing to pay for advertisement and such like, you're better off doing more or taking some time to re-think your plan. I hope you don't take any offence as it's not meant to be, but to me, you're the one working super hard for this and it's your money.

My suggestion is, if you haven't, reached out to other interesting projects you like and see if they're willing to cross-promote with you. You plug each other. In all honesty, you'll probably get a lot of non-replies or negatives, but it's a good valid way and a lot of projects do it these day.

The other thing is that, it seems, that your project is a board game with a playing card component. Nothing wrong with that, but it may have an identity crisis of who you're appealing to or maybe it's confusing people as they're unsure of it. For your board game side, do you have any physical copies even if it's a test copy? The board game communities are HUGE. Try to reach out to people in that community (you'll have to do your own research). Have videos of play test so people can see how the game works. Maybe even have prototype print and play versions for people to try out and take feedback. Same thing for playing cards, there are places to print out test samples of them and you can find reviewers, there's a pretty prolific reviewer on this forum that post regularly in the review section, who have their own reach and audience. These last bits might not be as useful now and maybe something to think about if you decide to relaunch if you're unable to successfully fund the first time.

None of this is hard and fast rules, but I think if you're willing to pay, you're better spending your money and time in other ways to promote your project as you worked hard on the project.

Good luck and I hope some of the advice is helpful.

7
Design & Development / Re: Feedback on custom deck
« on: March 14, 2017, 04:34:25 PM »
Hi Dan,

Sorry to hear that, but good luck with your relaunch.

If you don't mind some advise. If you're going to conventions, have you thought of drumming up interest with people buying your work there? If you think about it, if they're willing to buy one print, a deck has a lot more in it at a very affordable price. Equally, have you thought of reaching out to new of the playing card news site such as Kardify. The guys that run are amazing people and playing card fans. I'm sure they'd love to have an article about your deck on their site.

8
Hi Chris,

So to answer your question in terms of card quality, the weight though is important isn't exactly the same between MPC and USPCC or EPCC (Expert Playing Card Company). MPC, I believe, uses a large scale digital printer to print off their artwork which is then cut up into playing card size. USPCC and EPCC use sheet or roll feed offset printing. I've had my own work printed on a digital printer similar to what I believe MPC uses. It's good, but the art quality is nothing compare to the offset printing you'll get with USPCC or EPCC.

As much as paper weight matters, what else does matter is the coating (aka the finish) that goes onto the card as part of the process for it. Again, however it is done, there is quite a noticeable difference between what you can get from MPC and USPCC/EPCC. You honestly can't say they're similar as they're quite noticeably different. I believe due to the printing process and how everything is, when you hold and use a deck fromp MPC and USPCC/EPCC, it is a very big difference and I do believe this is due to the printing methods.

If you have all the artwork set up, you can easily just order a sample prototype test deck from MPC so you, yourself, will be able to feel the cards and come to your own conclusion.

9
Design & Development / Re: Best USA fulfillment service for Playing Cards?
« on: February 10, 2017, 11:34:25 PM »
I used Collectable Playing Cards for my Kickstarter and they did a great job.

10
Design & Development / Re: Ten Kingdoms by Emdash project
« on: January 30, 2017, 04:17:02 PM »
My suggestion is that you probably want to keep the proportions the same across all the cards so ideally the heads are roughly the same size. At the moment, the Queen of Hearts, since she's looking straight on, makes her face appear quite a bit bigger. I think having that scaled down a bit would help.

The suggestion on colours is maybe have it so that one colour is more dominate per a suit and that is kept throughout the court cards. For example, the Hearts lean more heavily on purple. That way it helps make the courts more recognizable at first glance.

I am unsure of how you're going to render the final artwork. If you are creating all the works traditionally and then scaling them in with some colour adjustments as the final artwork, I'd suggest make the artwork 2-3 times bigger than the actual size. That will help all the artwork tighten up really well.

Good luck!

11
I think the different between playing cards and coins and stamps is that for coins and stamps, misprinted versions tend to be recalled and destroyed so that there's only ever a handful available. I think that's what makes their error valuable as it's part of the rarity of it.

I've yet to see a misprinted version of a playing card deck where it's recalled, destroyed and reprinted. The closest to that would have been the first run Deco by Encarded were a lot of the tucks were damaged and sent back to USPCC due to the foiling, tuck material and how USPCC's machines work to fold the tucks..

12
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Ellusionist Clearance
« on: December 10, 2016, 09:35:18 PM »

Really, I didnt think it was angry post, sorry if i came out like that.


I didn't think you were upset, ceres23, but it mostly a suggestion. I've see more than enough friends and people get raging upset over their luxury hobby and it's confusing to me.

I'm with hecrob in that if I dislike how a company is going about their business, I just stop buying from them regardless of whatever they put out until it changes. Does it hurt them? Honestly, probably not as I never did buy a lot.


13
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Ellusionist Clearance
« on: December 10, 2016, 05:54:12 PM »
I think all companies need and have various strategies to move product and one of them is "buy $XXX amount and we'll give you this super special deck that's not available any where else!". In many ways, a lot of them have to kept to that method. Sometimes they run other promotions where you can randomly get that deck for a lot lower, like a lottery (ie. D&D Mystery decks).

I think you're describe two different problem, cere23.

The problem with E is that they're seem to be devaluing their product by intentionally selling their stuff super low half a year later or a year later, at least with some of their product as they've used a bunch of different sales strategy. They use to be quite found of the buy a brick and get a super rare LE re-colour you can't buy.

While other companies are just found more ways to give away their deck, but it's still effective free as you never paid for it except for some that put it up for a high price, but then I don't think they've ever intentionally devalued it as collectors gave it that specific price.

I think the problem is that E's marketing has always been a bit "wonky" to put it nicely while everyone else doesn't seem to go that far, at least in my memory. E will regularly go "look what we found in the vault! We'll never find some more again! Get it now!!". But ultimately a company has to do what a company has to do to make money and keep on thriving. And sometimes it is the honest truth that a company has found stuff that's misplaced and no one remembered anymore 'cause that staff member might be gone.

I think the question to ask why are you collecting? Is it to have super high value decks? If that's the case, I think modern might not be the best thing as price will fluctuate for that in many more years to come and maybe vintage or antique deck is the way to go with more certainty of value upon return or at least steady value. If it's collecting for cool things, maybe wait it out for a cheaper means to get that deck (ie. lower prices or even trade someone else who might have extras).

A luxury hobby shouldn't be pissing you off 'cause there's a lot of better ways to spend that money. I think you want companies to play by your rules and ultimately, they will play by whatever rules works for them.

14
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Kings Wild Project Reserve Note
« on: December 10, 2016, 12:31:40 PM »
Do you mean the Unbranded White Reserve Note or the Unbranded Black Reserve Note?

If I remember correctly, the reasoning for the different print run for Unbranded and Branded White Reserve Note is just due to popularity. People liked one over the other and more of that was ordered.

As for the Unbranded BLACK Reserve Note, it was always meant to be a limited edition and short run. USPCC did not under print it and they printed exactly what was ordered by Kings Wild Project. 1000 decks were printed and that was the original intention. It's a 1000 print run using bee stock as well.  The Branded Black Reserve Note has the exact same courts as the White Reserve Note version, but in a fancier tuck box.

Price shoot up due to limited nature of it and a lot of people that had it kept it for their collection so the few of them ever went up for sale and when they did, well it's supply and demand of business.

15
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Kings Wild Project Reserve Note
« on: November 30, 2016, 10:18:16 PM »
Hi,

I think the problem is that value and worth for any deck, more so modern deck, can vary a lot. If you're looking to sell something quick or soon, then take your best offer. If you wait for the long game, the deck could potentially go up in value or sink in value for whatever reason. And ultimately value/worth is what someone else is willing to pay for it. You can believe it's got a high value but if you can't find someone to give you that value for it, then it's really worth less.

16
Welcome!

The size of your collection doesn't matter too much. Just enjoy it whether it's big or small and that's the best part: sharing something cool you enjoy. And honestly, we all had to start somewhere and you'd be surprised at how fast your collection will grow.  ;)


17
 :D

Thank you so much for this info, Lee!

Like you said, mistakes happen and more often than not, the team involved is more horrified at the issue than everyone else. I've been there myself, unfortunately.

Thank again, to you and the board of the 52+J, for doing standing up thing to ensure that all members are happy!

18
For me, no apology needed.

Mistakes happen. I've been there with companies that have made them and almost made them myself. I know it sounds like something simple should be so easy to avoid, but when you're working on a project day in and day out and you're staring at the project so much, you honestly kind of skip over the simple things 'cause, at least that's how I feel, you think you won't make them.

Mistake or not, it's still a very beautiful deck.

19
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hello
« on: October 29, 2016, 04:21:58 PM »
Hello and welcome the forums.

Trust me, you're not the first person with a collection problem here ;)

Reputation is pretty much anyone giving you a point feedback for what you post. Sometimes people are weird and odd or they butter finger it on their phone or something. It's not a big deal.

20
Yes!!! That will happen today. Stay tuned, and an email will go out to membership about purchasing new Stutzman club decks. Thanks for your patience!

I can't remember which day it went live, but for all club members, the option to purchase the club deck is now available on the club site.

The 52+J instagram page has a photo collage of the deck: https://www.instagram.com/p/BMCTxTjAUSE/

It is an extremely beautiful and well designed deck.

21
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Decks holding there value?
« on: September 25, 2016, 07:03:07 PM »
Similar to what a lot of others have already said, your best bet is to collect what you like and enjoy. If you're trying to collect something in hopes of it holding their value or going up, it's a futile game.

The problem is short of a few certain things in this world, when push comes to shove and you've got to unload it, you'll seldom ever get the value you want for it. This is more so for modern deck where the market is uncertain and unstable. At least with antique and vintage decks, being that old, at least there's a more of a certainty, but again, it's not guarantee.

Buy what you like and love and be happy with that. I think it'd make collecting a lot easier.

22
Design & Development / Re: Programmes to create cards
« on: September 05, 2016, 10:59:17 AM »
There's no specific program for what you're asking for.

Any graphic program (ie. Photoshop, Illustrator, etc) can be used to put a design on a card template.

23
It's understandable.

It sucks, for whatever reasons that Kickstarter is still limited in certain countries. I know they've expanded as they use to be solely US based only.

Sometimes you have to do what you have to do. And I just forming a partnership with someone just to use Kickstarter can be very very risky.

Good luck!

24
The best answer besides the payment thing is probably familiarity and inbuilt audience numbers.

People are use to Kickstarter now. It's big. When you think about crowdfunding, a majority of people think of Kickstarter as the first thing that comes to mind. It's something a majority of users are so use to know. It's like the whole PC vs Mac thing. People will defend each one and say it's definitely better and all that, but a majority of the reasons is simply what people are use to.

A lot of people know about Kickstarter so there's a lot of in-built traffic due to that. That's not to say you don't have to work, but you're going to get Kickstarter backers that are randomly browsing the site that might land on your project and pledge. I don't know hard numbers and I'm going to use the internet for this, but look at both their Alexa Ranking:

Kickstarter USA : 214

Indiegogo USA : 628

A lot more people are visiting Kickstarter over Indiegogo and that adds up over time. It's not a bad platform to use, from what I can see, and they have their own success story.

For a lot of people, I think they want to go where they're use to, where they know things better and where they think they've got a higher chance of success.

25
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Fake Streamlines?
« on: August 27, 2016, 04:16:47 PM »
I don't believe it's so much construction paper as a layer they have inside so that the cards don't send out being transparent when held up to the light. I know for some manufacturers that they have their own glue that dress opaque and ends up coloured. Collectable Trading Cards like Magic the Gathering is like that if you rip a card in half.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 17