Poker.buddy - if you have more things to add within moments of making a post and no one else has posted, please edit your last post and add the new information. It cuts down on clutter around here.
I'd suggest removing the white border around the circles. When you die-cut the chips out, if the registration isn't perfect, it becomes much more obvious with the border. And a poker deck has to have a two-way design - your deck name printed across the back is one-way.
Sorry. I am quite new to using forums. I won't do it again.
The problem I find with not having white boarders around the holes is that it cheapens the design significantly. It make it look like you designed something then just stamped a hole through it. I have tried to leave as much room around the holes as possible to stop this being a problem. I will also be going to the factory they are produced in to make sure there is strict quality control.
- Make it very obvious that this comes with cards included on the FRONT of the box, if you ever plan to sell these on a store shelf. Even a sticker you can peel off at home that says "cards included!" would do wonders.
Hi Alex. This is actually an excellent idea. It has been a real challenge, design wise, to get across to a potential buyer that there is in fact a full poker set inside. Even though it just looks like a deck of cards. This something I have had to constantly think about. But putting a simple sticker on the front (on top of the foil would make sense) saying "Cards included!" a very effective simple solution.
- The back HAS TO BE TWO-WAY. Even the most casual poker players I've played with like to scrutinize a deck. No one wants to play with cards that a nine year old can cheat with.
Many people have told me this so it seems like something I will have to change. Maybe I am just being stupid but could you explain how you could cheat with cards that have one-way backs.
- The #2 most important thing about a poker deck is index readability. Serif fonts are a big no-no. But cursive fonts have to be the only thing worse than that.
This is something that I have already changed after printing out the last prototype cards. Here's a screen print of the new font.
- Those cards look bridge-sized to me. Nobody likes bridge-sized cards, and they have no place in the plane of existence. If they are bridge-sized, expect a seriously lower amount of interest.
They are actually have a custom size of 58mm x 95mm. There are a couple of reasons for this; the first is that, the two holes in each card compromise the structural integrity of the card. To minimize this it took quite a bit of testing to get the dimensions right so that some parts of the card were flimsier than others. If you have a poker sized card (which is actually the size I started with) you get lots of solid space at the sides but not down the vertical center. This is a problem because it means the cards can bend easier. Bridge sized cards I found far to small to do anything with in-terms of design. I found the best way was to use a custom size that still felt comfortable in the hand, kept the cards structural integrity and also gave me a decent amount of space for the graphics.
- Take the index of the cards, and move it into that blank space in the corners to improve readability. You should be able to see what your cards are from a quick 1 second peak at the corners.
I think I will have a look into this since I think this could work quite well without effecting the design too much. Let me do it now and I'll upload another picture.
Everything else about the design is very nice. I love the artwork. It screams classic card design, but then has quite a few modern elements to it. Good job.
Thank you very much. This is great to hear coming from a designer.
EDIT:
Here is the design with the indexes closer to the corner.