You are Here:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sovereign

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Design & Development / Re: Texasplayingcards.com
« on: December 23, 2013, 03:10:13 PM »
I want him to admit Kickstarter has a flaw.

It's their game, you're the one who is asking to play. I found Kickstarter slow to respond and it was clear that I was one of thousands of people they had to deal with, but they weren't arsey - don't dedicate yourself to fixing their system, just jump through the hoops and use it to your advantage.

Good luck!

Phill

2
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 17, 2013, 04:20:34 PM »
What if you did two flags with a design in the middle, or two crossed fags?

Here is a (crappy) image of *kind of* what I am talking about. (Forgive the image, I only have access to MSPaint at work...  :-\)

Edit: Those are supposed to be eagles on a coin in the middle, for those of you that can only see scribble of blobs of crap.

EAGLES.

Double plus edit: Pretend there are stars on the flag. Cause apparently stars are true to cannon for America-stuff.

Justin, this is a pretty cool idea, it has the rotational symmetry right. I'll have a think.

3
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 17, 2013, 04:18:48 PM »
Hmmmm. The back designs with the flags just don't seem to mesh with the court cards, in my opinion.

I think the best back you've had is actually the first one, mainly because it has the same lithograph style as the face cards. Maybe try doing something less minimalistic? I think your best bet for this deck is to have a highly detailed back.

The later visuals were just to show the layout, I intended for them to have the same style as the others, with both the wibbly wobbly flag, the fading and the engraving lines.

4
Design & Development / Re: Kickstarter Question for Past Designers
« on: December 17, 2013, 09:15:57 AM »
I was going to say I disagreed with Jackson and that I wouldn't want to invest in a project that was an unknown in any regards, then I thought about how much my Kickstarter did and then how much his did and I thought "You know what, shut up." and I did.  ;)

Phill

5
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 14, 2013, 02:18:14 PM »
Seriously, though, it would require little research.  Look at just a few period painting depicting the war and you'll have enough reference for uniforms and weapons.

Cool, I'll just press that 'Do Job' button my clients assume is built into every mac.   ;)

Phill

6
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 13, 2013, 05:05:54 PM »
I think I might hold that back for the box? Dunno.

7
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 13, 2013, 04:49:24 PM »
The four ribbon locked wax seals on the treaty is pretty iconic
http://joshblackman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/treaty-of-paris.png

8
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 13, 2013, 04:37:24 PM »
I dunno, I do like the flags (also it was a suggestion from James and I like the solid blockness of them). Both of the flags are instantly recognisable as the flags of our two nations, but both have changed since the Revolutionary war, and I like that, that sense of nation and the zeigeist that the flags capture. I toyed with the idea of using military ensigns, or the Naval Jack instead of the Union flag, but again, I like the idea that the Revolutionary war was about more than just two military forces, it was about that sense of nation.

Don, you're like the kind of client I hate - forget reaching for an iconic graphic solution, why not spend 20 hours researching and illustrating historical military units? Thanks.  :(
To be honest, I am continually aware of flippin' Jackson R with this kind of thing: http://www.kingswildproject.com/images/kwbackhero2.jpg he has got historical Americana on lockdown.  >:( I don't want to use curlicues or the kind of woodtype ornaments I usually like, simply because I don't want this to look like a 'me-too' deck. (Since my Fedora 52 went down so badly! ;-P ) I was thinking of looking at architectural reference, Lukeout's chair suggestion is good, but it would have to be done in a non-JR way.

I'll have more of a ponder tomorrow I reckon, thanks for everyone's input.

9
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 13, 2013, 12:45:20 PM »
Hi Speedy, I haven't really thought about that but I don't think it would be too hard to do, I could double up the flags so it is rotationally symmetrical. (crappy visual attached)

10
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 13, 2013, 06:03:34 AM »
Current thinking on the card back - James suggested possibly incorporating the two flags of the nations (both of which have changed since). I quite like the block print effect, but I might dig back in and think about some other ways to represent it.

Phill

11
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 13, 2013, 05:39:19 AM »
PLEASE, I BEG OF YOU!  Make the tuck box look authentic to the period - but LEAVE OUT the artificial aging!  Make it look like a pack you would find if you were in Boston in 1775, true to the period but not all dirtied up.  The dirty deck concept is really getting worn out now.  Does the Constitution have all kinds of stains and tears and creases?  Think about it.

Good point I guess, but I should have clarified that I was going to dig in and make the aging *accurate* rather than making it a mess of grunge brushes. One of my friends is a special effects artist who gave a talk at a magic meetup here in the UK which was basically all about realistically aging props, I was planning on pinching some of his ideas.

The Constitution does have faded damaged ink, ink spatters and surface stains btw.  :P
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Constitution_of_the_United_States%2C_page_1.jpg

Additionally I should mention this isn't a commercial deck, it is an insanely limited edition for the competition.
I lied about the box anyway, I'm looking at the backs now.

Phill

12
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 12, 2013, 01:34:14 PM »
Right on the money Don, that's actually what James suggested. I was toying with adding colour behind the lines, but I like the effect of it looking like the engraved printing was done in ink of the appropriate colour. The decks are going to be fairly minimal I think, I was tempted to go crazy lavish but I like the idea of making it look like a real piece of ephemera from that era - I'm going to go nuts with the aged printing on the box I think.

Box next.

Phill

13
Design & Development / Re: Revolution Deck
« on: December 12, 2013, 09:25:32 AM »
Busy afternoon, looking at some different styles, I'm thinking something like this might be the winner:


14
Design & Development / Revolution Deck
« on: December 12, 2013, 05:38:35 AM »
Hi guys, earlier in the year when we launched the Great Whites deck we ran a competition to have a custom deck designed for you - James Watson won and after a lot of discussion he decided on a deck based on the American Revolutionary War. Attached is a screenie of the development for the face cards. I'm going full custom all original on this deck, and I've spent a long time figuring out the face details and including characters from the era - it should be pretty cool, I've got a good feeling about it.

I'm planning to make the deck feel kind of like almost an antique deck from the time, so it will be aged but not overworked - I'm really quite excited about bringing it to life. I'll keep posting as I draw all the threads together and get everything in place.

I hope you guys like it.

15
On the KS page it's £10 for 1 deck and £6 shipping, so that's 25.72USD I think?
So it's not $25 shipping, but $25 for one deck *plus* shipping.

Ref: site - thanks!

Phill

16
Before being too harsh on Ashley for the cost of shipping, the price break down might be of interest - bear in mind that to ship a single deck to the US using Royal Mail, even shipping it as Airmail printed papers to get a reduced rate could cost as much as £7.20, which when you add on the cost of secure packaging could make up about $12 / $13 dollars of that $25 cost. I don't know the deal Ashley has done with Ivory, but 100 decks doesn't win you a very low price per deck - if you assume that he is splitting the money with the designer, then once you remove the actual print cost and the packaging and shipping cost, he could easily be making $2 a deck or less.

So just a heads up that whilst you may consider it 'overpriced' I doubt that it is greed that has forced the price there - for limited runs like this it is more likely that that price is the only way to avoid losing money on the project.

Phill

17
Mind of Kennedy is this guy: http://www.mindofkennedy.co.uk/ who is a bud / design client of mine (I built his site), and he uses his decks in his professional performance - they actually feature an optical illusion I designed. Help My Supply Teacher Is Magic is a TV magic show here in the UK.

I used Ivory for my Creative Solutions deck and we worked closely with them for the two DMC decks. I wouldn't have gone with them if the quality of print, finish and manufacture weren't excellent. If you have any doubt as to the quality of the finish, check out this video: http://youtu.be/ilAUgCgQNi8

18
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Bargain Priced Deck
« on: November 06, 2013, 04:18:40 AM »
I bought two dozen decks for 99c each at Slots a Fun in Vegas, brought them back home and thrashed the hell out of them performing close up at gigs and events. They were casino stock bees with the corners clipped: I have a little craft corner clipper here so I just clipped the other corners so they didn't look too weird, and they handled great and did their job nicely, plus I quite liked the story (which involved me getting stopped by customs because stacked together the decks looked like drugs on the X-ray, at which point the customs guy starts pulling all kinds of magic crap, bent forks and the like out of my bag.)

Slots a Fun was so nasty it's awesome, and if you wanted a footlong hot dog (that's probably 60% sawdust by weight) for 59c I'm not sure what other option you've got. Looks like it's been rolled into Circus Circus now as something other than a totally skanky mini casino, so I guess that that's done with now. :-(

19
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Clockwork Bicycle® Playing Cards
« on: October 30, 2013, 04:59:34 AM »
Funding has been cancelled - they probably got round to getting a quote from USPCC and shat a brick. Never mind!

20
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Bicycle Grungeland
« on: October 29, 2013, 09:21:54 AM »
I find it remarkable that they would use the word 'dreary' in their marketing - remember it means "depressingly dull and bleak or repetitive". Great, just what you want customers to think.

21
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Guess who I had dinner with tonight?
« on: October 28, 2013, 05:09:54 PM »
This story is crazy awesome. One of my friends got invited to Blaine's in-suite-party during Blackpool magic festival a while back and he said he was super nice. (He also said Dan & Dave were incredibly weird but there you go)

Phill

22
 8)
I know that some collectors go nuts for USPCC but if you don't want to gamble your house on a deck launch and you don't want to move 2500 units then they aren't the most practical. There are other printers who do good work although they don't have the same big name. 100 is a manageable launch - if your cards look good, you have a non-terrible video and you are careful with your target you should hit it without too much stress.

Phill

23
These look nice, but I would be less cagey about your printers - if someone says they are keeping something a secret most potential customers will ask "what don't they want me to know?" It may be that you are concerned about concealing your price in and hence your profit - IMO this is a false economy. (In fact, I'm willing to bet from looking at the die cut and fold on the box on your image that I know who it is you are using - if I'm right, make sure that you get the right sized box, because their standard box isn't a tight fit for a deck. If I'm wrong, sorry!)

Design wise it looks rustic and old-school - personally, given the 'heritage' design concept I must admit I don't get the "Since 2013". That's fine, not everything needs me to get it in order to exist. I do think that using a slashed zero, which is commonly associated with digital age, might be a mistake on something that otherwise screams heritage. But obviously it's your call.

That said, good luck with the deck and your KS project.

Phill

24
Design & Development / Re: My updated deck of Bicycle Playing Cards
« on: October 22, 2013, 06:48:08 AM »
Besides being a gaft deck what else would my cards need to appeal to the magician.

In my opinion / experience with magic, the cards need to be instantly and clearly recognisable. When I spend five minutes generating dramatic momentum leading up to a single moment of amazement where I reveal the card and say "Is that the card you are thinking of?" the response I don't want is "Er, I don't know, wait a second, er..." Just my opinion though of course.

Phill

25
Design & Development / Re: texasplayingcards.com
« on: October 17, 2013, 08:39:31 AM »
Sprouts obviously believes in his project and I genuinely hope he confounds all nay sayers and storms it.

Pages: [1] 2 3