1
Playing Card Plethora / Re: CONTOURS Playing Cards
« on: September 05, 2016, 01:02:28 PM »I really like the artwork on this deck and hope it funds this time! Good Luck Olly!
Thank you very much, glad you like them;)
You are Here: |
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I really like the artwork on this deck and hope it funds this time! Good Luck Olly!
Looking forward to the launch . Do you have a date and time?
I see blue prints also when I look it. I like the art, I like the name slicks also but it doesn't match the deck, it's confusing and turns me off as a consumer.
Better to choose a name that will resonate with your audience. The word "Slicks" doesn't even come close to evoking what you've created here. I'm also wagering that Randy's not the only person to make the "slick/oil" mental connection, despite it being inaccurate. A name can make or break a product.
I'm actually in agreement in that "Slick Deck" doesn't evoke this kind of imagery at all. Perhaps a name more closely associated with lines? "Linear Playing Cards" or something more creative to that effect? Perhaps "Silver Lining," if you get the linework done with some silver metallic ink or foil.
I would suggest renaming this Deck the Keyline Deck. The Art looks a lot like an Illustrator file in Keyline (outline) mode, and I think it would go over better than the current name. When paired with your screenname, Oily Swinyard, the Slick name gives off the impression that it will be an Oil Slick themed design.
Thanks, Randy
from an artistic point of view, and I guess thats what you were aiming for, consistency is way more important than readability. The last version with the stronger pips does not look as elegant anymore. Why leave your design ideas and use too many line thicknesses. players who won't be able to read it properly won't play with custom playing cards anyway. its mainly a collectors or playing card enthusiasts item, so why reduce the art aspect for some practical reason. no artist should do that, if one has to sacrifice some of his design ideas for that.
Hhaha that was completely coincidental I didn't even notice. 'Aztec' perhaps?BTW: is it coincidental that the line-version pips all have capital "A" shapes in them? Might consider using a name that starts with "A" as well...
Wow, well spotted I should have noticed (given that AA are my initials) - though I'm sure Olly has a much more interesting thought behind this one
These look phenomenal !
I vote for standard pips however.
At the minimum, you should use standard pips and solid, filled-in letters for the indices. They're easier and faster to read, makes the design more functional.
Looks great to me. You've got a good work ethic!
Alright cool I'll fiddle around with it this week.
It's all done digitally using the tracking pad on my laptop.
Tracking pad - WOW! Going by the laptops I've used, that is seriously impressive
Looking forward to your updates!
Going thinner is good advice to separate the intricate detail, though if you want the design to 'pop' I'd also introduce some thicker lines - or perhaps block areas of black, which would provide more contrast and 'lead the eye' through the detail... Can I ask if you're drawing these on paper or digitally? - just curious
While I don't have a problem with your suicide king, I can see how he may come across a little 'in your face (or eye)' to some ... How would you feel about giving him a smirk or comical expression to emphasise that sense of fun?
I get the whole "suicide King" thing, but stabbing himself in the head and through his own eye? It's a little extreme.
I point this out because some of your potential buyers might be kids whose parents supervise their purchases and wouldn't want their kids to have access to grotesque art. (Not that it's gross or whatever, but in terms of the definition.)
Definition of GROTESQUE (as applied to art). 1. a : a style of decorative art characterized by fanciful or fantastic human and animal forms often interwoven with foliage or similar figures that may distort the natural into absurdity, ugliness, or caricature.
Though I find some of the courts to be a little too decorative/detailed, which is somewhat distracting (i.e. QoH), I still like the overall artwork.
Nice detail in your drawings Are you planning on adding colour or keeping them black and white (and red)?Thanks:) I wanted to keep them black and white I think.
Here you go:Why not show it and let us see which would be better?haha same thingHere's a bigger version haha, not sure if the pips work btw
Hmm... What pips? Jokers don't have pips. Indices, on the other hand - plural for index - that, they have.
Why not make the joker in the same pattern/style as the court cards instead of the spot cards?
If you mean just doing the face of the joker, I tried that and it didn't really work tbh. Ive been messing around with it for a while and actually feel this one works the best.
haha same thingHere's a bigger version haha, not sure if the pips work btw
Hmm... What pips? Jokers don't have pips. Indices, on the other hand - plural for index - that, they have.
Why not make the joker in the same pattern/style as the court cards instead of the spot cards?