Avoid NPCC - that's Noir Arts, right?  I haven't heard a good thing yet about a Noir Arts print job.  Use MPC if you can't get Expert.  I daresay from what I've heard that crayons and oaktag paper would be a better alternative, but bear in mind my information is all second-hand.  All I know about them is that their website is an awful mess including large swaths of text stolen from other sites about their own printing work.  Don't take my word for it - copy a hunk of text and do a Google search like I did and see for yourself.

Yet another hate speech from person, that never had any of NPPC's deck in hands.
Followed your advice - googled. And haven't found ANY stolen text. Yes, the website isn't perfect, but let's be honest anyways.

My advice to you - don't lie to people here, and explain the real reason why you hate them.

For those, who'd like to find out why - on very beginning, NoirArts asked don boyer for his feedback on one of their first projects. The response was something like "blah-blah-blah, I'm super cool professional, all best decks in the world was created under my supervision...", and then he asked to pay money for his FEEDBACK! And this "offer" was reasonably rejected.

DUDE! ARE YOU FOR REAL? Most of the projects are created by people, and FOR people who have PASSION for playing cards. Who collect and LOVE them! Who enjoy them!

And you care only about money. Very cool, "professional" attitude: "If you don't pay me, I will lie and do everything to ruin your reputation". 

I disrespect such miserable, greedy people. And very sorry for those deceived people, who believe such "professionals" as don boyer.

You, don, turned this forum into hate-speech-sump, which will never have the same outstanding reputation as unitedcardists, for instance

PS -
regarding NPCC as a printer:
- cardstock is ok
- coating could be better
- tuck boxes - amazing (got both Chivalry and Indictus decks - BEAUTIFUL)
- cool seals with non-standard shapes
I hope their next decks would be even better. It is very interesting to observe how they improve and become more recognizable. A lot of things has to be done, but the progress (from Demon deck and to Indictus) is already noticeable.

OK, let's see what we have here...

Sugar skulls for all the courts and jokers...check.
Lots and lots of metallic ink...check.
Completely monochrome design...check.
One of the most unfortunate deck names I have ever seen...check.

Yup, looks like they hit all the bases with this one!

Honestly, I can't be the only person who's a little tired of seeing so many decks with sugar skulls, lots of metallic ink and a monochrome design, right?  The really unfortunate name is new - but then again, who would want that?  "Defunctorum" sounds like the name of an over-glorified junk yard!

As for me - it looks pretty cool. Personally I like monochrome design. Backed it, and waiting!

I've seen good feedbacks on other forums, and could not keep myself from commenting your agressive feedback on almost every single deck here. What is your problem? Your criticism is absolutely unconstructive. If you know how to do it better - just make your suggestions. Or make your own deck

By the way Don, how many playing cards have you designed? Can you show at least few?

Vomitorium - this is about your miserable comment, not this deck