You are Here:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tanderle

Pages: [1] 2
1
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Relaunch
« on: November 22, 2015, 05:11:59 PM »
I am having some black Friday pre-sales. Don't miss out on reduced prices. Limited quantities!

$44 for Four (4) Olympus Decks
FREE SHIPPING within United States

$60 for Six (6) Olympus Decks
FREE SHIPPING within United States


2
I prefer the red deck.  And I wish the indices were a bit less jumbo-ish.

Agreed. The red deck is definitely my favorite out of the two. I was thinking about doing an Egyptian theme. Oh well.

3
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: November 11, 2015, 10:15:54 AM »
I officially relaunched. Thanks for the advice along the way.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/286203767/olympus-playing-cards-deck


4
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Jetsetter Playing Cards (KS)
« on: November 01, 2015, 09:20:44 AM »
Exploring a "branded" version of Jetsetter Playing Cards. See attached. Nothing official... yet.

I like the branded backs.

5
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: November 01, 2015, 09:08:11 AM »
The art was pretty attractive last time as well - you just need to market them better.

Know any message boards for people into Greek history and myth?

I was happy with the art last time but they look much better now in my opinion.

I agree with Don. You need to plan your marketing outside of the playing card community. I call this a "dual community concept." The big win will come from marketing to those who are interested in Greek mythology, history, and literature.

I don't want to say the playing card community is low hanging fruit but it has a better awareness of playing card projects. You still need to market the playing card community but increase your effort outside of the community and in the concept community (i.e., message boards, Facebook groups, partner with blogs or websites, etc.).

Totally agree with you and Don. I admit that I dropped the ball last time but I plan on heavily marketing this time around.

6
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: October 31, 2015, 12:31:05 PM »
Take a look at the redesigned Aphrodite.

7
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: October 25, 2015, 12:48:09 PM »
Yeah I completely dropped the ball with marketing last time. Here is the new and updated Dionysus.

8
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: October 24, 2015, 03:47:34 PM »
Here are the cards below.

9
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: October 24, 2015, 03:39:35 PM »
I am finally starting to work on my project again. Thoughts on these cards?

10
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: September 20, 2015, 02:19:23 PM »
Oh I see. Thanks for the insight.

11
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: September 18, 2015, 08:05:25 PM »
Why did you go with Legends branding?

Where was the promotional campaign?  You announced the launch - and vanished into thin air!  With thirty or more decks running at any given time, you need to keep people aware that your project exists or they'll forget all about it and move on to the next deck.

I went with Legends because of the 1,000 print run (USPCC is 2,000) which lowered the goal.

You are totally right about being MIA. To be honest, I should've waited a little bit. Life got hectic as I bought a house and got married.  Between moving and planning a wedding, I really didn't have much time for promotion.  That was a big mistake on my part. I want to really take some time to fix some things and make this deck better.

12
Playing Card Plethora / Olympus Failed KS Project
« on: September 17, 2015, 07:40:27 PM »
Hi guys. Unfortunately my Olympus playing card deck did not fund.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/286203767/olympus-playing-cards

I am looking for some advice for an eventual relaunch. I want to take a decent amount of time to get this right. I am thinking about going with traditional black/red. I may also customize all the aces. I spent a lot of time on the artwork and I would really like to see the cards get funded.  I am open to any thoughts you all have. Thanks.

Tom

13
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Playing Cards Relaunch [KS]
« on: August 17, 2015, 11:24:51 AM »
Hi everyone. The cards are now live: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/286203767/olympus-playing-cards

I want to thank everyone for their suggestions, help, and support.
Tom

14
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Playing Cards Relaunch [KS]
« on: August 16, 2015, 09:26:03 PM »
The rework looks great!

I personally would like to see Gold Foil embossing on the Legends branding as a stretch goal.

Similar to the Bicycle Archangels deck if you wanna see what i mean.

Ah yes, I have that deck and the embossing does look very nice. I'll look into it and see how much extra it would be.  Thanks for the idea.

15
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Playing Cards Relaunch [KS]
« on: August 15, 2015, 06:32:08 PM »
Looks a lot better imho :D
Yes I think so too. Everyone was talking about borders and I had no idea what they meant haha.

16
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Playing Cards Relaunch [KS]
« on: August 15, 2015, 06:12:58 PM »
Thanks for the clarification Don. So the white would be considered the border you are talking about? Here is how it would look if it was thinner:

17
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Playing Cards Relaunch [KS]
« on: August 15, 2015, 05:52:26 PM »
Looks good from here.  And yes, I'm agreed with Cardfool - LPCC has more precise registration allowing for more uniform centering and cutting, so you could enlarge the design a bit more and make the border a little thinner.  I think it would be an improvement.

Thoughts on these borders?

18
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Olympus Playing Cards Relaunch [KS]
« on: August 14, 2015, 05:11:51 PM »
I like it a lot! :D  When is the re-launch?  BTW, would you consider making thinner borders on the backs...LPCC has very good alignment, unlike USPCC
I plan on launching over the weekend or early next week. I will look into making the borders thinner and see how it looks.

19
Playing Card Plethora / Olympus Playing Cards Relaunch [KS]
« on: August 14, 2015, 08:47:15 AM »
Hi guys. I thank everyone on this forum for their suggestions and constructive criticism. I plan on relaunching my Olympus deck of cards soon. I changed the colors and went with LPCC. My new target goal will be around $8,500 instead of $15,000. Here is a first glimpse:

20
I made the blue a tad darker actually.

21
Making the deck less expensive is always a good way to improve your odds.  Remember that a shorter print run will come with a higher per-deck cost.

The blue was much better than the black, though it needed tweaking.  If you go black, use yellow instead of metallic gold - metallic gold ink is very dark and you'll have the contrast issue all over again.

Don, any idea how much Legends will charge per deck for 1,000?
Thoughts on this color combination? Trying something different.  That blue reminds me more of Greek colors. Like Santorini.

22
I don't think I am going to reach the funding needed so I am thinking about doing an eventual relaunch.  I would plan on going with Legends because they require only 1,000 instead of 2,500.  This way I can drastically reduce the target goal.  Obviously the tuck box would not say Bicycle anymore. I am also thinking of changing the colors to be black and gold.  Do you guys have any suggestions that will help me make this more successful or do you think this deck will never get funded?

23
I started tinkering with making that dark blue in the card a little bit darker to add more contrast. Good idea or bad idea?

24
I could go for yellow, especially as it is on the court cards.

Just tried yellow. I'm not digging it, but thanks for the suggestion.

I tried lightening one blue and darkening the other. I kind of like this the best. Thoughts?

The last picture is the original

25
I'm still not sold on the blue, but that is MUCH better.  You'll also avoid the risk of colors not transferring from digital to print perfectly and bleeding into each other.  Apparently even more common if you design in RGB instead of CMYK, but that's just what I've heard.

I'd like to hear what others think because I prefer the light blue. But I trust everyone's experience here and I do not want any issues with the back if this ever gets printed.

Pages: [1] 2