there is no problem at signing the cellophane .. i have 2 set of new fan back that is signed none of the signature is sort of rubbing off
While there are no issues with a signature rubbing off if the signature isn't fresh and still wet, there are benefits to having the cellophane removed before signing.
I have decks in both states - signed right on the box, and signed on the cellophane. I'll use examples of both.
I have some David Blaine White Lions decks that are signed on the box. I opened one and carry it sometimes for use. A collector could say, "Wow, you've killed the value of that deck," but if I bust that out for performing a trick, my spectator (or friend, family member, co-worker, etc.) will often say something to the effect of, "Holy cow, that's David Blaine's autograph! When did you meet him? That's so cool!"
I have a Bicycle Brimstone deck signed by Russ Kercheval that's signed on the cellophane. The deck is still sealed and wrapped. To a collector, that's like the Holy Grail. But to me, it might as well be sealed in amber unless I don't care about losing the collectible value of the deck. You could say the same about the above example, to be sure, but with the signature on the cellophane, I also have to be careful to preserve the cellophane on the box after it's been opened if I want to retain that signature for "show-off" purposes to spectators or friends. One mistake opening that wrapper or handling it after it's been opened and the signature is destroyed. I could somehow tape the cellophane down to preserve it, but then it looks like crap, and what's the point?
That doesn't mean I don't like my autographed Brimstone pack. But it does mean that I'll be far less likely to use it as an "active" part of my collection.
But I'm so far off topic here, it's ridiculous. Guys - on the subject of the Spectrum deck - I can't wait to get mine!
Cosmo, I just filled out my survey earlier this evening - everyone else, if you kickstarted this one, what are you waiting for?!