USPC will not let you use 809 as your deck's model number. It's in use already
Model numbers still in use at USPC for standard commonly-available decks:
7 - Streamline jumbo index
9 - Tally Ho (both backs)
11 - Streamline
21 - Streamline pinochle
44 - Bicycle Rider Back pinochle jumbo index
48 - Bicycle Rider Back pinochle
77 - Bee jumbo index
86 - Bicycle Rider Back bridge-sized
88 - Bicycle Rider Back jumbo index
92 - Bee (named after the year of initial release, 1892)
125 - Bicycle Rider Back "EZ See Lo-Vision"
807 - Bicycle Rider Back in classic box (AoS still labeled 808)
808 - Bicycle Rider Back in new "Standard" box
809 - Bicycle Mandolin Back
813 - Bicycle Maiden Back
914 - Aviator
917 - Aviator jumbo index
918 - Aviator pinochle
1201 - Hoyle
1202 - Hoyle jumbo index
1205 - Maverick
1206 - Maverick jumbo index
1211 - Hoyle pinochle
There's a lot more numbers for all the non-standard products, like Eco Edition, Pink Ribbon, Large Print, etc., but these are the decks you'd find typically selling in a "mom-and-pop" store, as opposed to a national chain with more buying power and a hankering for special design exclusives.
I thought you gave up on this deck, seeing as how it was the opposite of a rousing success on Kickstarter when you first introduced it.
Non-standard decks can sell, to be sure, but they're not an easy sell and can take years, not weeks, to develop an audience. The Rook deck from Parker Brothers, issued just over 100 years ago, took a handful of years before it finally found an audience - it didn't hit the peak of its success until over 40 years after its introduction. That deck succeeded over time because it was designed with a specific audience in mind - people who for moral or religious reasons don't use a standard deck of playing cards. Who's your audience? Be realistic about it, not "pie-in-the-sky".
No casino will introduce this deck on the gaming floor until you can produce accurate statistics on the house odds for any casino game you'd use them for - and that's no guarantee of success because they still have to decide to approve or reject the design, whether they like the odds presented, and their customers may or may not be open to trying a new game they're not familiar with, especially if it's more complex than what's already out there, just like yours is.
And none of this touches on the expense of getting a deck with over 56 cards printed. You can go with a company that produces cards for board games and the like, as they have no standard quantity from game to game, but you'll also end up with cards of equivalent quality - and they're certainly not designed for their slip and glide. Such cards are most likely to be made of cheap stock that won't faro even in the hands of the most skilled card sharp.
Why on Earth are you so concerned with the dating numbers on the Ace of Spades?? Your BOX will have a copyright date on it! You're spending all this effort on a detail that's trivial compared to the other hurdles this deck will have to jump over if it stands a chance of getting made.
I still think you'd stand a far greater chance of success if you altered your designs to match the Bicycle Rider Back and USPC standard faces, only getting the extra cards printed. You could drop them in a custom tuck box large enough to hold the extras and a full pack of Bikes - your product gets completed for a minimum of cost and in a design that's familiar with the entire North American continent and much of the rest of the world.
In fact, you wouldn't need a truly custom design for the box - USPC already makes boxes large enough for holding two decks, thanks to its game-specific two-deck sets for games like canasta, rummy, etc. You'd only need to alter the art to suit your design. If you have the extra cards printed with some game rules (either on a folded sheet of paper or on some extra cards), you could fill out a two-deck box rather nicely.
Forgive me if the solution seems too simple, but even you have to admit it would drop the cost of your design by thousands of dollars. It would also make the cards easier for people to adopt because of the oh-so-familiar design, one that's been around for several decades - the back design is over 120 years old and the faces haven't changed much since the middle of the previous century. If the face design was a person of the same age, it would soon be eligible for retirement benefits! Lastly, you'd be able (with the company's approval, of course) to use the Bicycle brand name on your product, something that will automatically give it at least a small boost in sales.
