That goal...wow. There are several new KS dcks with really, really low USPPCC goals. Makes me really nervous. They may have good intentions but if the KS succeeds, yet there's not enough for printing AND shipping...wow...
Got my decks a few weeks ago. I think they look very nice. Ok on another topic. I have a question for all you card critics and design advisors (yes you Don). The creator is currently designing his next deck and had a question for me yesterday which I am passing on to you guysOne of our ideas would have the face side of the face cards illustrated as a two-way but the top and bottom halts would have differences so technically it would be a one-way design. The backs would still be a two-way. Would this kind of design be a huge turn off?Let me know what you guys think
Quote from: badpete69 on March 11, 2014, 11:00:19 AMGot my decks a few weeks ago. I think they look very nice. Ok on another topic. I have a question for all you card critics and design advisors (yes you Don). The creator is currently designing his next deck and had a question for me yesterday which I am passing on to you guysOne of our ideas would have the face side of the face cards illustrated as a two-way but the top and bottom halts would have differences so technically it would be a one-way design. The backs would still be a two-way. Would this kind of design be a huge turn off?Let me know what you guys thinkIt would really depend on the design and what the changes were. In other words, there's not enough information from which to draw a conclusion. I will say there are people that are dead set against two-headed courts that don't have matching heads. I'm not one of them, but it should be organic to the theme - again, "Johnny Five need input."