You are Here:

Poll

Erdnaseum or Erdnase 216's

Erdnaseum
216's
Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216

Author (Read 2947 times)

Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« on: January 22, 2014, 08:45:38 AM »
 

john

  • cham cham cham
  • Frequent Flyer
  • *
  • 859
    Posts
  • Reputation: 48
  • "Shh don't wake the bitches" - Zimos

Erdnaseum

IErdnase 216

Which old design with a new Erdnase twist do you love more?
"I got my people, watching the corners, letting me know where the bitches are." - Zimos
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2014, 10:19:44 AM »
 

splice42

  • True Member
  • *
  • 48
    Posts
  • Reputation: 1
216s all the way. I don't really like that ambigram on the Erdnaseum cards, to be honest. I've been carrying a 216 around and it's a solid deck, stands up to table faros without a complaint. It's an OK back design. It'd be better without the one way back, I suppose, but it can be a useful feature for some. You can dig that edge reading, for sure.
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2014, 11:32:34 AM »
 

Anthony

  • 52 Plus Joker Member
  • Haven Citizen
  • *
  • 1,150
    Posts
  • Reputation: 140
  • Growing old is Mandatory, Growing up is optional

  • Facebook:

  • Twitter:
I picked up both recently and while I like them both for my collection, even a novice like me was amazed at how the 216's felt and handled.
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2014, 12:33:39 PM »
 

Don Boyer

  • VP/Dir. Club Forum/DAC Chair, 52 Plus Joker
  • Administrator
  • Forum Sentinel
  • *
  • 19,172
    Posts
  • Reputation: 415
  • Pick a card, any card...no, not THAT card!

  • Facebook:
To me, the Erdnaseum deck was merely OK.  The packaging was nice, but it had little to distinguish it from the other Bee Erdnase decks.

The 216s are a totally different beast.  The have a feel unlike anything I've ever seen come out of Erlanger, and perhaps Cincinnati as well.
Card Illusionist, NYC Area
Playing Card Design & Development Consultant
Deck Tailoring: Custom Alterations for Magicians and Card Mechanics
Services for Hire - http://thedecktailor.com/
Pre-Made Decks for Sale - http://donboyermagic.com/
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2014, 02:13:46 PM »
 

Jamm Pakd Cards

  • Discourse Veteran
  • *
  • 257
    Posts
  • Reputation: 9

  • Facebook:
216's for me! 
Justin
Jamm Pakd Cards
Wild West Decks - Coming Soon to Kickstarter
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JammPakdCards?ref=hl
Website: www.jammpakdcards.com
Kickstarter: Wild West Coming Soon 2016
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2014, 10:39:43 PM »
 

Rob Wright

  • 52 Plus Joker Member
  • Aficionado
  • *
  • 1,363
    Posts
  • Reputation: 98

  • Kickstarter:
Got the 216's on Don's recommendation. Just a great deck of cards.
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

 Steven Wright
http://neverforgotten.storenvy.com
Facebook- Never Forgotten Project

My Playing Card DB
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2014, 10:56:28 PM »
 

bhong

  • 52 Plus Joker Member
  • Discourse Royalty
  • *
  • 377
    Posts
  • Reputation: 47
  • Mere-Mortal playing card collector
I picked up both recently and while I like them both for my collection, even a novice like me was amazed at how the 216's felt and handled.

I'd second that and just have to say, 216's for sure. Honestly, nothing feels like that at all.
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2014, 10:18:47 AM »
 

yoel

  • Forum Regular
  • *
  • 109
    Posts
  • Reputation: 1
216's handle amazing and look badass.  I find the Erdnaseum's to be an eyesore hands down probably the ugliest deck in my collection.   
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2014, 05:47:45 PM »
 

Don Boyer

  • VP/Dir. Club Forum/DAC Chair, 52 Plus Joker
  • Administrator
  • Forum Sentinel
  • *
  • 19,172
    Posts
  • Reputation: 415
  • Pick a card, any card...no, not THAT card!

  • Facebook:
216's handle amazing and look badass.  I find the Erdnaseum's to be an eyesore hands down probably the ugliest deck in my collection.

You need to get around more, then!  I've seen FAR, FAR worse!
Card Illusionist, NYC Area
Playing Card Design & Development Consultant
Deck Tailoring: Custom Alterations for Magicians and Card Mechanics
Services for Hire - http://thedecktailor.com/
Pre-Made Decks for Sale - http://donboyermagic.com/
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2014, 10:46:06 PM »
 

yoel

  • Forum Regular
  • *
  • 109
    Posts
  • Reputation: 1


You need to get around more, then!  I've seen FAR, FAR worse!

I said "in my collection" of course I've seen worse but I didn't buy them.  As for the Erdnaseum's well I got them as a mystery deck otherwise I would have never bought them. 
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2014, 11:02:13 PM »
 

bhong

  • 52 Plus Joker Member
  • Discourse Royalty
  • *
  • 377
    Posts
  • Reputation: 47
  • Mere-Mortal playing card collector


You need to get around more, then!  I've seen FAR, FAR worse!

I said "in my collection" of course I've seen worse but I didn't buy them.  As for the Erdnaseum's well I got them as a mystery deck otherwise I would have never bought them.

I wouldn't say go as far as to say it's an "eyesore" but I think the text on the back doesn't help the design as much. The Erdnase Acorn back is a better way to do the text on the back of the card.
 

Re: Battle 67: Erdnaseum vs Erdnase 216
« Reply #11 on: January 30, 2014, 09:35:31 PM »
 

john

  • cham cham cham
  • Frequent Flyer
  • *
  • 859
    Posts
  • Reputation: 48
  • "Shh don't wake the bitches" - Zimos
216's win by over 10!

Deck of the Year #SOON #January31StUntilFebruary14Th #Justwaitonit
"I got my people, watching the corners, letting me know where the bitches are." - Zimos