Wait, I need to make sure I understand you before I can answer your question: you think that every deck with a custom back and standard faces are the same from a design perspective?
To me, (my personal opinion) a deck with a double logo back design, and all standard faces (not even an ace as of now!) is as boring as it gets. May not be technically the same due to the difference in back, but everything else yes.
That makes sense. Fontaines may be simple, and even uninteresting, but they are at least still attractive, at the very least they are not unattractive. These are garish, the design is amateurish at best, looking like a colored pencil drawing in a highschool notebook. These aren't boring, they are hideous. Which is worse to me.
These days, most card campaign videos are a waste of time. If you can't do something with polish and professionalism, it's often not worth doing anything at all. Uusi and Emmanuel Jose did some rocking videos for their more recent campaigns. But if all you're going to do is play loud music and show cardistry moves, or worse, show animated video of card renders and play some craptacular royalty-free background music, save the time and effort and just make the cards.
Man, am I glad to hear this! I was worried my campaign was going to be "judged" for not having a video.
Not including a video is not a bad thing, I wouldn't even worry about that, if you have a good design it will speak for itself.
Including a video can be (is) a great way to promote your deck, something with quality and purpose.
Adding a bad video is like attacking me personally and can kill a project.
Stay away from that last one.
(Read 2133 times)
