It just seemed like such an abstract reason for a relatively abstract inclusion. But for the sake of argument, and I do so love to be contrary, thematically the image of Jack from The Plucker is aesthetically consistent within itself, not at all a mixture of genres or universes you seem to find in it, and without any understanding of the source material, doesn't mirror the either the broad whimsical influence exhibited in the Stutzman illustration or the mixture of imagery you admire from the lion in the classical shoes and falconer's attire. While I do love your ability to let your personal sense if whimsy allow you to get caught up in your own fantasy around the image and hope you share my appreciation for what I consider to be one of the best living fantasy artists around, the post of the picture seems out of place and your reasoning threadbare and abstract. But I don't want you to take that critically, posts like yours make the forum more lighthearted and enjoyable to be a part of and is more and more a rare gem amidst a growingly negative and pragmatically defeatist community.
Thank you for this message. I still have some difficulties to understand all the subtlety of certain words in each of the english sentences, but I think of having understood the essential points.
In reality, I think that I derailed myself a little bit with this image. From my point of view, I see similarities but it is probably too personal for being posted here and you have well demonstrated it to me.
I recognise that I maybe tend to see certain things where they are not so I understand your reaction. That said, I also hope to see one day a deck inspired by American McGees' universe. Not having finally the Alice: Otherlands video game, we will maybe have the deck..