I like the overall concept - very unique and quirky, with appeal to both people who grew up with "Xerox reproduction technology" and to hipsters!
Two tips:
1) I'd advise being careful with the backgrounds on the faces. One thing I've noticed about playing cards in general is that companies are as careful as they can be about back alignment (an off-centered back can completely ruin a deck's two-way design) but often less so with the faces because it's not as critical. With those lines extending into the bleed area on the faces, a slightly off-centered print of the faces, off by as little as a millimeter or two, could result in a face design that's one way on all the faces. In itself, this isn't necessarily bad - but because it goes into the bleed, the lines would be visible from the edge of the deck. I've demonstrated this effect before - using a similar such design printed with a slight alignment flaw, I was able to invert a card in the deck, shuffle it thoroughly and spot the card simply by looking at the deck's edge, as if it was a stripper deck but without the stripped edge allowing me to pull the card out (though I could find it all the same and even cut to it). A simple border of white around the edge of the card would prevent that from being an issue without having a noteworthy impact on the design.
2) Consider going with a higher-quality printer as a stretch goal! MPC is OK, but there's better and still within the range of affordable if you look around. Expert PCC and Legends PCC are two popular choices. A higher grade of stock than what's offered by MPC alone can make the difference between a decent deck and a fantastic one.